In this week’s installment of Ask Chris, I roll up my sleeves to do some hash-settling as I offer the definitive answer to the question that has divided Periscope Studio: Could a caveman beat a Shaolin monk in a fight?
There is one obvious answer, and my blunt, “nuh uh you guys are wrong” insertion of myself into an inside joke that originated 3,000 miles away has probably ensured that none of the Periscopers will ever want to hang out with me again. But hey, at least you’ve got something to read over lunch!
Plus: Batman and Shakespeare, together at last for the first time since the World’s Finest went back to Colonial Days and Superman told the worst lie ever!
Does that make Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Rob and Don?
Please say it does.
Rosencrantz: To you it shall be in good time revealed,
that noble prince of Wayne in darkness’ garb
is in combat unbeaten and ne’er shivs
but rather epitomizes nasty.
Guildenstern: I pray thee, though low jakcanapes we be,
do not sully my ears with “balls nasty”.
Rosencrantz: Alas, now it’s been said, you obligate
my quick and mirrored rebuttal to your plea
of silence, or at least less vulgar speech.
Let me profess that Batman’s “balls nasty”.
The Dane Prince Returns act II: “The Dane Prince Triumphant.”
Bravo Brian.
Coming late to this, but surely we can all agree that the deadliest man alive would be one that combined all the skill of the Shaolin with the absolutely fantastic hair of the caveman. That is to say…the spirit of Count Dante has returned once again to the ISB!